Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
3.25星吧，八个蛋是剧场版永远的主角。警校五人组的群像塑造甩开隔壁神奇动物3八条大马路。相较之下，去年的赤井秀一一定是得罪编剧了…
还挺好看的，近五年来剧情做得最好的大电影。主线情节方面，主要是警察学校篇五人组的故事线，有感人有热血，有大场面涩谷爆炸，最后还在小新一这里收束了世界线。感受到了柯南系列特别是大电影继续拍续作的商业前景和生命力。唯独一点，推理的元素越来越弱了，完全就是二次元商业大片无限续作系列😂
把漫威和DC都拉出来嘲讽了一遍，精准复刻好莱坞超级英雄的拍法和演法，玩法贱贱的，但还挺好笑，7分。
好嗨啊！简直就是一部彩蛋电影。从漫威到DC还有x战警，恶搞了好多超级英雄，还cos了好多经典电影和桥段。剧情也流畅，好看好看！
预言一波。期待在剧场版看到高佐结婚，不过感觉希望不大。如果结婚了，高佐必定会调走一个，除非柯南完结在即，不然少了一个重要配角后续怎么办
法国演员好敬业，动作戏亲自上阵，十八线小演员的武打功底都强到可以正面刚警长和罪犯呢。🤪笑点和致敬都很密集，最欣赏的是很多物件并非凭空出现一次就消失，还会有后续。
最搞笑的还是制作组给俄罗斯人加了好多戏，结果最近这时事…😂
小兰依旧没啥作用…要不删了吧😅
2022069真的好骚的一部电影，挂树上和吸尘器那段我在高铁上忍不住喷了出来哈哈哈哈哈
近年柯南剧场版来最喜欢的了！警校五人组太棒了👏
还成，除了那个炸弹槽点太多以外，算是近几年逻辑最通顺，推理最靠谱的剧场版了。
在经历十连扑后剧场版终于原地复活了。剧情好燃啊，感觉日本人和俄罗斯人适合相爱相杀...
日本的第二年生日又去看了柯南剧场版，相比于第一年，日语虽然有些提高还是很多地方听不懂，任重而道远呀。相比前几部剧情玩好不少，情节依然是牛顿看了都落泪，超人看了都不会，虽然很难回到20年前那种真正意义上的侦探剧场版，但是鉴于最近几年的进步，四星鼓励！
原本以为用一部长片讲一个对现实存在如此尖锐讽刺的主题应该会有更深层的探讨，但是没有，还是停留在了做表面b级笑点的阶段。不过喜剧的部分做的确实很扎实，近些年最好笑的喜剧片之一了，尤其连巴黎圣母院火灾，亚历克鲍德温误杀都能解构且并无冒犯感确实可见水准。不过依然认为漫威现在的影视执行团队实在该看看这片，就说一件事，这部电影里所谓恶搞拍出来的badman的动作戏，难道不都碾压所有漫威剧集的动作戏吗？
实在是对男大宿舍感情戏没兴趣。
后面那个初代复联的集合真的是笑惨了，挺好的
婚礼与葬礼，万圣节的涩谷街头与异邦人，我们到底有多久没见到这样一部工整且充满悬疑色彩的名柯剧场版了！！！也是唯一一部让中后期出现的一些角色大放异彩而不是走马观花的剧场版！有柯学，但那又如何？懂不懂什么叫テーマソング的含金量！我只想坐在影院疯狂鼓掌！
1. 要跳出惯性思维看柯南，不要在我执中觉得这些很假不现实。接受它既定的价值观
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈受苦白男请这么拍
片头做得真好看/南瓜头大军有种宗教仪式般的惊悚/柯学因素减少/小兰全程下线
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
