Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
游戏改编的及格作品，寻宝解谜的过程弱于《国家宝藏》，荷兰弟和马克的选角与游戏实在有距离，男女主没有火花强行凑，结尾直升机吊五百年古船更是离奇，好在节奏流畅，动作戏不含糊。看个乐，可以期待下一部
很喜欢狐妖系列，从漫画到小说一直追，幕后人员都很棒
IMAX机器故障导致整个画面绿的像钢锯岭，弟娃儿动作戏多的我觉得他赚的是辛苦钱。
这什么剧啊？我真不理解，剧情完全看不懂，演的也不好看
腾讯，爬
（5.0/10）又回到了游改电影普遍难看的那条老路上了。在电影这门艺术里，真正吸引人的东西是“人”而不是那一道道关卡。
纯爆米花商业片也分有没有用心用脑拍的，本片显然是没有，而且装都懒得装
这片子最大的卖点是Tom Holland湿身和卖肉吗？两个男主毫无火花，闯关解谜也太过简单（玩游戏也不至于简单到这种程度吧），几段打戏比如吊灯，飞机，船上有点早期成龙电影的意思。其实一开始全员恶人的设定倒有点意思，后面翻转了就比较无聊了。Btw,我觉得荷兰弟很不Nate诶，印象中Nate应该是个大块头（也不知道为什么会产生这样的印象）希望他以后能出演摆脱蜘蛛侠或者本身固有的形象的角色吧，不然随时以为他下一秒要喷蛛丝了。＃2022院线14,评分:6.5/10。
除了荷兰弟太嫩之外，找不到别的不足，德雷克的游戏配音有客串 就是沙滩上打招呼那位。经典游戏主题曲也有出现，游戏迷可以打8分了。开头有些拉胯，尤其是拍卖会部分太儿戏了，最后的飞船大战很爽。整体上还是推荐的
让你哭的时候哭到心塞
来了三年没来的星河
就。。。过于简单，顺利的剧情推进了。很适合在大银幕看，笑笑就过了。
当德雷克从海里漂上岸时，有个人对德雷克说：“你们俩怎么搞成了这样。”他是游戏中德雷克配音和动作捕捉演员诺兰·诺斯。所以他后来说，我也发生过。
就普通的爆米花。
所以我就以粉丝的视角来说吧，首先，一定要把它当平行宇宙看！！！这么多年了，他们还是不明白，为什么不顺着游戏的剧情拍，没有任何改编都行，这要做到这一步就已经很棒了，其他的只要演技不差特效不拉跨就行了但他们就是不明白。
07年的游戏，拍出了二三十年前好莱坞同类型夺宝主题类电影的感觉。并且从屋顶跑酷开始，就全面向上个世纪成龙闯荡好莱坞时期的动作喜剧电影靠拢。
过于爆米花了…8022年了这类电影能不能有点成长啊，当然荷兰弟还是挺帅的
除了两场压轴大戏，其他时候都挺省钱的，开片那段甚至绿幕的痕迹极其严重。说它多难看倒是没多难看，只是错在过时，所有的制作都是好莱坞流水线上常规水平，然后用以运作一个上个世纪夺宝奇兵式的剧本。However, 今年不是1992，今年是2022.
全程开挂的爽片，地狱难度毫发无伤，不用管怎么找到的，爽就完了。
——2022.05.25
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
