6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful.
A brilliant and outragously funny satire of society, 7 December 1999
Author: Dave Joerg ([email protected])
"Flodder" is one of the funniest movies ever made and few people realise that it is a Dutch movie made by none other than the Holland version of John Carpenter, the famous Dick Maas, author and director of the thriller "Amsterdamned". The Flodder family is the reincarnation of the term a-social. When the whole family bunch, basically all bastards, criminals and sluts must be relocated from their City slum because of toxic waste under their house, the city council house no choice. The only available space is in the "Zoendal" - the "Sun Valley" the best area in Amsterdam where all doctors, snobs and businessmen can afford to live their lives. And where the central point of interest and politics is the tennis club of the community. The Flodder family brings devastation to the tranquil world that ruled before. They are simply unbelievable. The characterisation is incredibly funny, beginning with Ma Flodder who searches other people's trash cans for food or making illegal liquor in her cellar and ending with the eldest daughter who is the biggest slut on earth. Together they make the most horrible family imaginable, a sort of immoral mirror image to the Brady Bunch or the Waltons. When the City counsel of Amsterdam hoped that the Flodders would show their good will to be more civilised in their new area, it turns out that Holland's most famous family would rather bring out the worst in the rich people of "Sun Valley"-wonderland. The rest is a hilarious, brilliant and well made social satire that can be watched as a provocative movie as well as a straightforward comedy. Dick Maas at his best. I salute him! Flooder was the Dutch smash hit in 1986 and brought two sequels and a tv series. All of the sequels were nice but not as great as the original.
Flodders (1986) is available on DVD in Germany in a dubbed German version in Dolby Digital 5.1. under the name:
"Flodders -Eine Familie zum knutschen"
Why is First Floor Features, the producer of the movie not bringing the Dick Maas blockbusters out on DVD in the Netherlands, I wonder. The are not even available on video there. These movies have so much potential, still to this day and have a huge silent but true following.
不明觉困。画面和配乐都凑合，剪辑和剧情过于随性，基本等于一个没什么主题的超长版社会主义旧农村vlog。
两年很高产但是没必要什么都接吧
最后二十分钟太震撼了。其实说的和《遗传厄运》是一个事情：关于邪恶的传承。只不过这部电影表达的更高级更空灵，她把结局描绘出了温暖的颜色——因为爱，邪恶不能消失但得以终止。影片中穿插的关于人类女性命运和为爱奉献的表达，也是让人泪水涌动。
寓言+“自然主义”+男导演拍“女性”题材+ elevated horror 一旦发现这四个元素撞到一起最好打起十二分避雷警惕，因为你将面对的很有可能是一个毫无灵魂的超低配版艾格斯。拿这种空洞苍白且满是浪漫幻想的说教去跟马利克相提并论，简直是跟马利克有仇……
看似血肉模糊，但却有个不折不扣的文艺内核，女巫化身生命体验者这个点子很是清奇，大段自白配合摄影风格确实马力克，从一片混沌到表达笑与泪，直至学会爱，影片用自己方式诠释了人类情感的重要性，还是很有想法的。
看似血肉模糊，但却有个不折不扣的文艺内核，女巫化身生命体验者这个点子很是清奇，大段自白配合摄影风格确实马力克，从一片混沌到表达笑与泪，直至学会爱，影片用自己方式诠释了人类情感的重要性，还是很有想法的。
马其顿偏僻山村的女巫故事，是轮回是宿命是挣脱也是徒劳但因为是对生命的眷恋对土地的热忱和对亲情的爱，所以才让一切徒劳变成一种有意的牺牲，披着恐怖外衣的哲理片，看得出导演对这片土地和人民深沉的爱。摄影和音效都太美了，人体的美和恶，人性的善与邪都在唯美的表达中显露了最原始的力度。作为导演处女作，绝对是优秀的水准了。
整体基调太压抑了，但故事叙述还是不错的，演员颜值不错，演技也很好，虽然给了大家一个开放性结局，但感觉不明朗
几乎要屏住呼吸看sex scene，调度得太好了，太好了，我再次体会到一种很久没有的感情。撕裂的疼痛下是茁壮成长、无法被隐瞒的生命力与希望。当忠于自己成为了一种政治选择，诚实的人就注定如此如此勇敢。“做人不能什么都怕，尤其是害怕自由。”我真开心我还能感受到这一切。
你说，“人不能对一切感到恐惧，尤其是为了自由”。于是，我不顾当局的黑暗统治，不顾阴冷的社会氛围，不顾自己的身份乃至生命，不可救药地，迷恋你。
马其顿偏僻山村的女巫故事，是轮回是宿命是挣脱也是徒劳但因为是对生命的眷恋对土地的热忱和对亲情的爱，所以才让一切徒劳变成一种有意的牺牲，披着恐怖外衣的哲理片，看得出导演对这片土地和人民深沉的爱。摄影和音效都太美了，人体的美和恶，人性的善与邪都在唯美的表达中显露了最原始的力度。作为导演处女作，绝对是优秀的水准了。
女巫换装秀以及欧洲原野风光摄影，外加一点看似高级，内核却空洞的女性主义，以及克尔凯郭尔的存在主义。一言以蔽之，不如咱的《聊斋》。
越来越多导演的处女作走coming of age horror的路线。我真的非常吃这一套。Naomi的那一段真的给我看哭了，眼泪啪啪掉。剧本写的太太太美了。Man want eyewater. But I have none of them. 作为女人却从没有学会流泪，而是在做那个英俊的男人的时候为了死去的小女孩痛哭。With a woman, I am glass. With a man, I am water。结合昨日新闻真的看的心痛难忍。
冲着Natalia的新作来的 剧情画面都很耐人寻味 探案部分也很紧凑 推理环环相扣。男主们女主们都完全不扁平 无论是未婚妻还是妈妈 都表演的很出彩。
男主和男二两次喝了同一瓶酒。
审讯室交织的眼神 雨夜橙色路灯下焚烧的阴暗过往 繁华的别墅中无法探寻的秘密 都是隐藏在波兰看似宁静祥和夜空下的白色恐怖 黑暗街角爱的火花 拥挤的房子最后一次的深夜派对 酒吧里点燃香烟的那一抹亮光 是绝境的希望 是人不能什么都怕 尤其是自由
她第一次变成男人站在河里摸着说“男人啊男人啊男人啊啧啧啧啧啧啧”这几个啧就很灵性啊
恐怖？就这？这拍得根本就不是恐怖片，是文艺片。适合拍成美剧。女主真美。
我为他们奉献了第一次剪辑，b站【“逃离波兰】（较笨拙，见谅）
主角塑造得有点扁，连他搭档都比他形象圆，实在是个败笔……但是如果说他的特质就是intensity，同Arek所代表的幼稚的“自由”相对，好像又可以说服我自己……片子的部分内容让我感觉，其实导演虽然在拍这样一个群体，但是对群体的关注非常随便，故事是集中在Robert崩断的那根线上，从而把视线投向更宏大的主体（压迫、官僚），而抛弃了深刻省察这种文化特质的机会……把角色扁平化，一方面确实可以在渲染背景上走到极致，一方面，却又太“东欧”了，如果只把同性恋当做受害者刻画……唉我说不下去了，我懂导演想拍出manipulative的感觉，但是主角能不能就是，不要像个提线木偶。？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
