Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
虽然片名叫“父辈”，但是全篇没有“爹味”。最喜欢第二篇《诗》，在三个男导演的作品中显得风格纤细又坚韧。
一些很难理解的感情线，格格不入的蕾老师，谁要看007拖家带口……安娜那么性感可爱火辣竟然戏份这么少！Q，好辛苦！！！
章子怡的显然情绪更细腻了，说是“父辈”，但母亲才是主角，无论是对国家事业的牺牲，还是对家庭孩子的隐忍，都表达出了第一代航天人的伟大与付出，往日之艰辛，奠定如今之辉煌。
还是最喜欢徐峥的故事，上海小家的故事，爱意浓浓的正能量。
整个片有点后劲乏力，开头的动作车戏看得鸡皮疙瘩都起来了，丛林里的遭遇战也不错。其他部分就特别乏味。遇上的反派想毁灭世界的理由都不同，有点心累。不过结局的一幕还是蛮感人的，一个系列的结束。
是万万没想到哭了半场的程度…前两个故事几乎全程哭…章子怡的诗确实惊喜👏🏻
《乘风》实在没有技巧，人死马伤先硬煽情再拔高，历史厚重却只拍出俗不可耐的故事。《少年行》前半段挺好的，后半段走向仓促了些。最爱《诗》和《鸭先知》。章子怡笔触细腻，生活本没有诗意，爸爸用生命作了诗，宇宙是让死亡渺小的东西，苦难艰辛之下的坚韧温柔。徐峥寓教于乐，三部曲下来他总能找到不俗的电影的点，这次模仿韦斯安德森，国内先锋，欣喜的事儿。
整体完成度上《鸭先知》跟《乘风》能看。我和我的父辈，其中的“我”都是男性，《诗》（这个跟《祖国》里的一个撞梗了，这个更加滥情）最终延续父辈成就的是妹妹，但在故事中拥有完整视角的仍然是哥哥。不知道为什么总要在电影里无所不用其极地丑化小朋友，我们真的没有那么虚荣那么势力那么尖酸刻薄。“比爹”又一次在电影里无比熨帖地成为情节的核心推动力和主要价值导向，这就是现在国产电影为什么让人感到恶心的一大原因。
这不是放弃演员，是准备放弃这个人物了？
主旋律很不容易拍出惊喜。勉强合格吧。很多时候剧情很尴尬。四不像，电影行业的拼多多，东拼西凑，为了拍电影而拍。鸭子是吃鱼的吗？我真不知道。
他有成功也有着最多的失误，他不再如前辈那样潇洒自如，甚至不觉得他像个Double O Seven
PS：安娜戏份虽短却极其惊艳，蕾老师美极了。
非常合格的商业大片，片头真是大爱，配音也请的汉斯大叔，情节也不舒缓会叫人睡着，但真不如隔壁《沙丘》。女性角色立体感很弱，仿佛是为完成邦德告别式的符号。尤其男女主C P感极弱，再次怀念能让邦德说出I‘m yours的eva。很想知道今后是准备重启这个系列，还是准备就让黑妹接棒了。
《少年行》
平凡的渺小
命题作文的质量越来越高，每篇时长四十分钟，对完整叙事大有帮助，只可惜还是意犹未尽。
生命是用来燃烧的东西 死亡是验证生命的东西
【7.3+1.5】
前两个比较沉重，后面的比较欢快，个人比较喜欢前两个，尤其是吴京那个，整体三星半吧，应该会爆。
果然章子怡的部分看着就细腻很多，吴京那里的内容可以精简一点，总体来说完成度还是非常不错的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
