Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
形式有多新颖，故事就有多老套。但是问题不大，大家都过分可爱，2D和3D的花栗鼠齐全了！IP梗用得财大气粗，迪士尼爱好者得有多开心啊。2022.5.23
三星半，四星给国产电影鼓励一下！剧本很有趣，表演都很棒，虽然有的地方比较扯，节奏有点奇怪，但是还是很值得看的！
就..一般吧 看到秃老肥的小飞侠有点唏嘘（
满屏的彩蛋 想过去致敬
好可爱两小只的屁股尾巴ww彩蛋太多了👀回去复习B99咯
有版权就是爽啊，各种真人2D3D混搭，想象力爆炸了。
咦，有阿拉丁元素，加分加分，哈哈哈
2d+3d+CG+定格各种元素融合在一起，刚开始不太能接受这种画风，后来想着谁会不想跟喜欢的动漫人物在三次元并肩作战啊就很enjoying了~
秀版权的成人向动画，2D和3D混搭在一起也挺自然的。奇奇蒂蒂是可爱的代名词，搞得这么社会摇……没想到是一部反盗版宣传片。
迪士尼家底太厚了…..简直迪士尼版“建国大业”哈哈哈 虽然梗老 但看的开心
不低幼，而且很超预期，喜欢迪士尼动画的赶紧去看。rangers我觉得是“游侠”的意思
两星半，挺无聊的，但我喜欢奇奇蒂蒂！！迪士尼烂！
暗黑版迪士尼，面向30-40人群。剧情不太吸引我，作为7D粉丝为团队的坚守打4个星。
▫️迪士尼版权霸主玩起串烧来还是可以的，片尾好看！但大多数角色我都不认识…乐趣减半…居然还塞了蚁人进来是什么情况！角色被盗版组合重装这个设定很有趣，可惜剧情过于普通有点浪费了。PeterPan my EYES！！！！！
剧情还挺无聊的，但有木兰尼和三表哥配音真的很难不笑hhh
不愧是迪士尼，梗也太多了。三表哥跟木兰尼搭档很有效果。
我是没啥童年情怀或者说大概压根小时候没看过，但是总的来说当一个插科打诨的梗片看也挺好看的，毕竟版权多为所欲为是吧？剧本本身比较普通吧，但是想起来把版权问题混进片子也算有亮点吧，反正看得挺乐的，给四星吧。
剧情比较简单，甚至可以说俗套。但是穿插对各种动画的戏谑，实在是有意思。
真的很荒谬，我以后要怎么面对小飞侠？？？？？
2D的Chip和3D的Dale破镜重圆 集齐天降奇兵队伍拯救伙伴～ 可可爱爱 各种各样被盗版的 正版的童年回忆们 但是为什么要这么对小飞侠？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
