Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
如果男主母亲当时没有去世，那将会是什么样的结局呢？一切都没有如果，可能到最后男主心里也会有遗憾吧？
没想到这么惊艳。美美的画风，淳朴的人民，没有夸张的渲染。就是想给编剧寄刀片，最后感人哭的不行。
描写一个刚毕业的大学生为“镀金”来到藏区最偏远的小学支教，与那里结下不解之缘，最终留下将孩子们培养成才直到生命终结的故事。演员的演绎非常感人真实，能歌善舞的梅朵美丽善良，对男主的感情真挚细腻，藏区风光美得令人窒息，藏族人民坦诚豁达淳朴的性格给人留下深刻的印象。难得的好题材好电影，应该让更多的人看到。
虽然没拍出特别的东西，但被质朴纯真的感情打动，无论支教多久，都会成为人生中难忘的经历
感觉男主妈妈很伟大，虽然台词不多，但能看出是一个非常开明，尊重孩子的人。
老师真的好，处处为孩子和当地人着想，只觉得暖心
焦距藏族地区下的支教，有幸让我们了解这边地区的教育问题。以及各种质朴无华生活、最后由这群平凡的孩子和支教老师所创造出带着泪与笑的励志故事。
演员们的打扮都好原生态啊我好喜欢！想去藏区的心情又被勾起来了！
服装疯狂看着挺舒服，剧情不评价，在同类型里也算比较平常
串联剧情的藏语歌曲十分动听。
说实话，曾经也有想过去支教这样的想法，不过我可能真的吃不了这样的苦
很感人。一定要有一个既有学识又有爱心的人留下来，才能让更多藏区孩子走出去。
太强调奉献了，好人坏人都很刻板，不过小孩子部分还挺暖心的。
很温暖，很治愈的一部片子。西藏的美景、藏族人民的条件艰苦、淳朴与善良都可以很好的体现。能感受到新人演员和小孩子的特别自然，导演也是尽力还原三十年前真实的生活，对于支教真是异于常人所做出的选择，真的很伟大。
韩老师中间经历多种困难，尤其是任教三年，母亲病重，孩子们以为韩老师不会回来了，内心仍然充满期待
比起流量电影，这种电影真情实感，催人泪下。只是觉得后面剧情纯属为了泪点而设，略显多余，另外，中间有一处BUG，那一段开路回家的情节大可不必，高原上如果真是路踏了，凭几个孩子根本无能为力。
感动肃然起敬，我曾经也有过当老师的梦想，可惜自己没有努力，确实十分十分后悔。
90年代初，一个名叫韩松的大学刚毕业就选择到藏区支教的老师，从北京怀揣一颗青春躁动的心，来到偏远的草原上一所藏区小学，与一群藏区孩子们发生的生活，学习与成长的故事。
良心作品，期待下一部电影，也希望还是这样美丽的景区拍摄电影！
孩子们长大后都很有出息啊，作为老师韩松能对他们一视同仁当成自己的孩子爱护教育，很尊敬
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
