Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
看一半睡着了，醒来继续看又差点把我干趴下。 生病去医院 有困难找警察。 5/10
蠻普通的恐怖短篇影集，雖然沒什麼新意，但有些鬼妝還是蠻嚇人。氣氛營造不太行，玩玩jump scare而已，勉強及格吧
由短剧构成的拼盘恐怖片，大学生小组课的水平，不建议观看
俗套的情节、粗钝的社会评论（导演似乎单纯只是想拍破败），再加上毫无惊吓设计可言黑暗环境jump scare一招鲜。费森登拍的Wendigo比这强百倍。
1、隧道+女鬼复仇男司机
2022年6月12日于合创国际宿舍（青岛）。
ps：女演员长的都不错！
开篇即拉胯，顶着噬谎者的名号就和人家这么简单就赌了？就花两千万请了一架私人小飞机就敢和人家玩命去？基本上全片除了赌弹珠那里之外都看不到主角有什么事先安排，都是一靠运气二靠临场发挥，不过最后的抽王八拍的还是蛮紧张的。那么大个科学家死的有点可惜了。
颜值片完全是，看他们那么中二，还是挺爽的，流星的这个角色感觉跟熊猫饲养员一样hhh三浦翔平也是年纪越大越帅，这个笔直笔直的身材，“啧”的时候太有型了！就是被绞刑有点惨，好好的科学家，被权力财力彻底毁掉了=L= 樱井海音虽然戏份很少但真是颜值好诶，最中二的还是本乡奏多，也就佐野勇斗还算是个正常boy🤭
怎么做到把每个本来可以拍的好看的故事都拍烂的
好久没这么爽，女演员都选的太漂亮，很容易出戏
明明知道不好看但是为了看脸还是看完了的电影。
期待了很久 但确实不好看 太松散 节奏慢 两星半
完全不知道它到底想讲啥，弄成这样，碎了吧唧的故事
俄勒冈州一名小镇的老师跟她的镇上警长哥哥发现了一件惊世骇俗的案件，他们察觉一位年轻的小学生行为举止十分异常，孤僻的个性以及诡异的谈话，驱使这对兄妹介入小学生的家庭调查背后隐藏的秘密，没想到竟掀起一阵腥风血雨的风暴，而古老的传说不再是天方夜谭，恶魔的苏醒也将带来毁灭式的反扑……
我喜欢《鹿角》的开场，怪物只见其声，躲在暗中，随着故事的进程慢慢揭开怪物的真容。恐怖怪异的氛围营造得很好，是那种你在凌晨一点看完后，得花点时间缓过神来的片子。
为什么不按着漫画拍啊，剧情稀碎。另外流星还是好帅。
1.物理专精锤子鬼 2.红衣周迅蜘蛛侠 3开始的牙医故事很戳痛点，怎么就半路剧本突变丧尸围城了呢 4.什么寄生兽吸血鬼捉迷藏缝合怪5.砸开墙挺吓人，突然吸入黑洞是什么鬼 6.没头没尾的大雄与任意橱的故事，有种拍一半都没决定拍灵异还是变态犯罪题材于是摆烂的感觉。7.公司给单身狗配鬼老婆8这又.什么手机美颜软件使用失败的故事 9.这还稍微有点诡异的人体模型，不过有些没看懂。 10.没头没尾密室逃脱。 综上 ，不值得观看，浪费两小时还没劲。
每段故事压缩得太过短，导致有些故事没头没尾的，看了一头雾水
十个小故事几乎没什么原创，都是一些玩烂的套路，除了俊男靓女，实在没什么让人眼前一亮的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
