Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
Conan the Barbarian, Macbeth, Vinland Saga, Come and See, The Green Knight. 7/10, disappointed over all. 全片最大疑问，瓦尔基里为啥戴牙套？
心肺经络家族树，野人屠村现女巫，奴隶球赛拼头槌，人体雕塑夜游魂，极恶亲娘毁童年，英灵武神三温暖，岩浆筋肉斗老叔；果然是哈姆雷特的正确打开方式，过瘾
（票房惨淡口碑也一般，估计与颁奖季是无缘了…
哈姆雷特的故事多少遍也不会腻，莎士比亚才是永远的神。
看的时候其实我一直在思考这个镜头是怎么拍出来的或者这个化妆好逼真
妥了 新食材 新菜谱 我指的是内脏（bushi）
人体器官的快速演化，对器官的艺术崇拜。背景设定是可行的，剧情看起来昏昏欲睡。
7分。豆瓣评分为啥这么低？又一个王子复仇记的故事，据说是最早的原型。本来没什么特别的，但是加入了神话和奇幻元素后就有了特别的看点。后半段渐入佳境，特别是那些诡异的暴力元素，比如那匹颇具美感的sui肢组成的马，威廉·达福的干瘪tou颅，以及王子死时的野蛮ji祀场面，非常原始非常神秘。剧情没什么特别的，但导演的暗黑和超自然风格却是吸引观众的。这种风格从《女巫》到《灯塔》，再到这部电影，一直保留下来，十分可贵，电影需要不同的风格。况且，第一场大战的长镜头和调度都可圈可点。
昭华如烟，雪花飞逝奈何天~ahh
大型Rammstein mv，岩浆上打架，不占个高地是什么样的后果已无需多言
在凝滞的奇观仪式中展露世界，甚至说这种推进吸收了NWR的神韵，谁能说二人随手拿出电钻头不是泰国警察从T恤里拔出砍刀呢。
当痛觉消失，当手术刀切入身体成为一种获得快感的途径，当人类可以随意操纵自己的器官
北欧版王子复仇记。 前面还行，后面索然无味。
回答短评第一条，Tom Hanks & Sally Field.
讲真 绝大部分电影都担不起严肃思辨的载体——也不需要——包括此片，几个象征寓意颠来倒去重复真是可怕的乏味。作观念展品论么，还不如上世纪的戈达尔先锋
哎呀我的个亲妈啊这到底是在干啥。我不能说完全没看懂吧，基本是没搞懂到底讲了些什么。蕾雅赛杜躺在手术床里那一段好性感，其他我真是不知道该说些什么。
还是一如既往的鬼魅和神秘，可惜故事后来的走向还是正常了些，可惜了那些怪怪的渲染。
The perfect render of ethnography and mythology, authenticity and outlandishness, OG viking black metal music throughout (!!) in the background and icelandic landscape in the fore. It just builds and builds and keeps getting better! I didn't know what to expect going in but came out mind-pretty-fucking-blown.
最后索尔吃下食物，不再痛苦，留下了泪。开放式结局，
前半部分大量的长镜头，中段是导演擅长的志怪氛围，到最后一场秒杀魔戒的裸男大战，21世纪血液里还流淌着纯正的古典美国电影DNA的人很少，艾格斯绝对算一个
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
