Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
继承了这个系列的所有优点，一种黄金时代香港贺岁片的闹腾和欢乐，希望麻酱可以再拍十部行骗天下，这个系列里的她明显是放的最开演的最开心的。
jesse和star还好好的活在故事里，虽然只有一点点台词和道具带过，也依然泪目了😢😢😢。本集有点一般或者说是丧失新鲜感了…反正都知道会是铺垫两小时反转两分钟的故事，看的时候就按怎么反转最离谱来做预设，到头基本都猜个差不多。另外胡子男的新歌依旧水平很可。（渣男好多怼脸特写他真的变得好丑啊…
《行骗天下JP》三部剧场版于我的个人观感：2022年《英雄篇》＜2020年《公主篇》＜2019年《浪漫篇》，哎，虽然这次有“孤独的美食家”松重丰出演，但类似的故事编排套路看多了也越来越不觉得新鲜刺激有趣了。—— 没有英雄的国家并非不幸，需要英雄的国家才是不幸的。-贝托尔特·布莱希特 -摘自《伽利略转》
阿部宽真的笑死。。。一张照片就能结个演出费
穿搭真的看人的，长泽雅美的打扮，放在绝大多数人身上，可能就只是俗艳。
东出比起两年前真的丑了好多，这就是出轨的福报吗
一直在滑进度条，期待甜蜜蜜时光
1)开头太甜了，颧骨升天的意思
一直在滑进度条，期待甜蜜蜜时光
充满爱意的剧场版，我预判了你的预判，但节奏感总觉有点乱。
电视剧轻松，电影唯美，所有的造型状态都还原了，超级有诚意！楚楚的表情太灵气了，太美貌了！演技🈵分🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵🈵
对不起，我觉得是系列最烂，牵强加超级荒诞，bug太多新人物来补洞，实在牵强
毕竟导演组也知道我们不相信这个电影里最后10分钟前任何人说的话了，所以观众和导演博弈的这个过程还是蛮有意思的
三星给达子和小猫们炎炎夏日带给我们的欢乐，一星给永远快乐活着的杰西、Star和2.5次元音乐剧《鸟兽戏画》。PS：熊猫的二头肌说话要笑死。
叙事比前几部有新意了，总之就是欺诈师永远不会输。以及，终于完结了……
濑户康史不错。希望star和杰西继续活在作品里。
算是圆了个梦吧 很多情节我做梦都没想到它能出现在大荧幕上
比起在意別人的眼光，活在懦弱與自卑裡。
豆瓣这个演员表是不是有问题，看完了也没发现我竹内结子在哪。
主题升高了 虽然很难 但一起携手走下去的决心最朴素也最打动人心
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
