Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
好America的青春，在中国永远不可能体验的，saaaad..
女主太可爱了！！！其他演员的表演都有些用力过猛，有点子尬、、、女主的新crush长得太像我一个师弟了，我全程跳戏。青春爱情片还是要找点俊男美女演看着才有意思。剧情很一般。。。
没什么营养但很甜。看长大了的moana演姬~
和《真心半解》之间差了十个《爱意，绽放》吧。
3.5，可爱的年少、可爱的涂鸦、可爱的友情、可爱的妈妈
Sports and lesbian!!! oh I love my sapphics😭 just when I was saying we need more female version of heartstopper!💜
Paige和Gabby在操场kiss那里，让我想起了我第一次跟别人接吻，也是身体僵硬气氛尴尬，不过回想起来也蛮有趣的。
很轻松很有趣。我觉得这片最棒的一点是它没有去写酷儿的社会/家庭困境，也没有写她们有多“不同”，纯粹是以成长和恋爱为主题。这也算是LGBTQ作品里一股清流，适合夏天。
开始诗音问悟美，你现在幸福吗，我还觉得很奇怪，但揭开后却是满满的感动，结局很浪漫
剧情真不是一般无聊啊，但是多给lgbtq片2星鼓励！同性片也有权无聊！
比较无聊，但是主角好看，友情和青( ･᷄ὢ･᷅ )亲情都很好
故事一般，但是gl终于可以在一个普通的环境下谈一个甜甜的恋爱了
哈哈，一部轻松快乐的酷儿电影。
现在的“青春片”都被框死吗，水平越来越低，剧情越来越俗，换成国产估计5分以下。
虽然剧情很predictable，但是我们需要更多的sapphic校园喜剧。还有我也喜欢AJ
主题不错 节奏也凑合 就是最后那部分有点太尬了
Shame doesn't live in this house.
三位主角都太好看了 只是故事让我想到heartstopper 却又没有那部那样辗转深刻 可爱 只能用这两个字形容这部电影
Nobody ever knows what you're thinking, including me.
无意中看到的，好难得没有任何阻力的感情线哦。色彩鲜明的青春片，感觉很久没有看了。女主有时候好可爱。小时候的几个演员长得也太好看了吧。\(//∇//)\全员相处都很友好，就看着很自然舒服。简直乌托邦一样的小甜剧。欧美人真的感情好利落呀，他们都没有那种纠结，就很清楚的知道自己喜欢的是什么。因为语言的问题就是很多双神的梗，没有办法理解，失去了一点趣味。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
