A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
带资进组的角色一律太尬。
没想到这个ip用的挺好的呀。苏文兴个人传，这个比起电视剧，我更喜欢这个。梗玩得很6.
简而言之，平庸之作。N
Boring...所以和Don't Look Up是同一个故事缘起只是一个黑幽讽刺一个贼正经吗？
一开始的太空事故之后，剧情就像窜稀一样引进了十几个角色，什么配角，配角的妈，男主角的儿子，儿子的律师，儿子的法官，男主角的前妻，前妻的丈夫，女主角的前夫，以及女主角的儿子等等等等。。。还有为什么要问欧洲借飞船，还不是你漂亮国NASA根本搞不出来，还有脸和总统说，呸
好莱坞第一灾难片大师，艾默里奇也是江郎才尽了，本该是其拿手好戏的科幻灾难类型片，却是剧情一部比一部扯淡，灾难场面表现更是一直在重现自己以往的作品，老调重弹，缺乏新意，惜哉惜哉！！！
作为一部商业大片还过得去啊，这种类型的片子你找不到什么惊喜，可能还有各种BUG，但是不就图一热闹吗？感觉评分有点偏低，豆瓣er们对灾难大片免疫了？
当电视剧的sp看吧，还可以。刘冠麟感觉还是演配角更合适一点。在抄袭网商的道路越走越远，咸鱼、世纪佳缘、互联网都冒出来了。
5分吧，除了在线的特效之外，就没有在线的东西了，可能意识到自己剧情垃圾观众不爱看，剧情就二倍速，演员们更是在那里自暴自弃地尬演。
毁天灭地还得看艾默里奇。细节bug的确很多，但盆友，月球空心、戴森球、外星人在月球背面…再加上毁天灭地特效，你还要求神马？考虑博物馆里的航天飞机多久能飞到月球吗？
说实话是有硬伤但不至于给1星吧哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。哈里贝里才是永恒暴风女神！！！！！——后面三分一真的崩，这设定真的不行啊，2022年了还说这个
脑洞和流浪地球一样大，巨物恐惧症看着很爽，不过镜头还是不够多。
难看到能一起看完两小时的人都可以称之为难友！就是，一个反向爽片还用40分钟交代剧情铺垫前史，以为自己是「驾驶我的车」啊，你配吗？上天和逃难两条故事线完全劈叉，感觉像看了三四五个网大随机剪一起。这种规模投资的电影应该剧本套路很成熟了，怎么还能把初级错误全犯了一遍……视听特效也并不震撼，听到Ai攻击人类时候简直都要把我土笑了。
这是把脑洞告诉小学生，然后让小学生写的剧本吧？把地球线砍掉，拉长月球线，加个和人类祖先的第三类接触，估计勉强能及格。
你以为它是灾难片？那你就错了，其实它是科幻片！没想到吧！
还能更扯吗？逻辑不通，细节也不用考究？人物也是俗套至极，特效更是审美疲劳了
原來是《後天》的導演，套路果然差不多，這麼多年都沒變。略顯浮誇了。
用脚写的剧本都能比这强，强行煽情注水，套路化工具人角色，毫无末世气质，逻辑随时随地硬伤，阴谋论又老又俗，看似特效大片其实棚拍痕迹严重，场景规模小气得要死。不过也算在意料之中，不是陪朋友我本身也不会来看这部片，只能说电影的社交意义远压过了本体质量。
本来以为会是2012的升级版，结果唯一亮点是权利游戏的山姆担任男配角。前一个小时候几乎没有毁天灭地的特效场面，后面又硬扯什么人工智能的烂梗，既不是灾难片也不是科幻片，特效场面严重不足，这片子拍摄成本1.5亿美元绝对是吹牛逼，太失望了！2012果然还是无法超越啊。
虽然单从故事来看是挺一般的，但是简简单单的故事里流露出来的各类细节可以为本片加分。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
