A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
磨寶推薦的電影，很能理解磨喜歡這部電影，但劇情過於男主視角，後半段不再是「若者たち」而是「若者」了
演技还是那么棒 ，演Gay很到位自然，很多小细节。 剧本不是很喜欢。 欣赏美好的肉体啦。
最喜欢小男孩和女演员的罗曼史，最讨厌学生和老师的罗曼史
挺轻松的，不煽情，不滥情，安安心心，诚诚恳恳的讲个故事，烟火气足够
喜欢这种生活化的画风 体现的感觉也是我的内心世界
事实证明真帅哥一辈子都在帅，叔演得实在太好，完全支撑起这样一部破碎的、断片式的电影叙事
如果不是莱昂叔，哭了，不管了，leo叔全都五星
直男和弯仔互相依靠竟是主线！😂几条罗曼史都是传统意义上的禁忌之爱 电影的中心思想是好的！
演员们的表演都很出彩，只是对男主形象的展现有点流于表面，没能深入分析到具体起源，作者埋了原生家庭、前男友这两条线，但都没展开。不过这样莫名浮躁、不安分的人物形象应该可以戳中许多现实中的男同吧，就挺真实的
快乐如闪电稍纵即逝，狂欢后的海滩只留下空水瓶与你，向南的道路却是一颗颗流浪的心
get到黑岛结菜的美了！如此完美的侧颜
和情绪稳定的人在一起很重要，看到不对应该转身就跑。忍受了这对父女两小时的情绪波动，很糟糕的观影体验...教不好就不要生...
挺好玩的，故事简单，也可以说没有故事，每段场景都蛮搞笑的，一点也不尬，也没有瞎煽情。我也不知道那些跟院线上亿大片去对标打一两星的都是什么心态。实际七八十分的水平，多打一颗星拉拉分。
分数低估了影片的价值。 一出看似混乱的闹剧，真实体现出的是走到中年面对的一地鸡毛。一层讲关系，爱与被爱，互相伤害又再彼此安慰。再一层，致敬《阿飞正传》，并完美展现社会责任，提升对同性群体的关注。影片结尾，一切变了，一切又都没有变，真实的人生，总是要迈步前进继续着一切。 男主和男配小gay以及儿子的演技精湛，难以想象是女导演拍了部男性群像，对于女性角色捎显粗略，唯有女邻居的设置，有略微点到一些韩国社会的性别议题。
情节没主线，像流水线一样的剧情，后半段女主完全退场，看完不知道个所以然，还两个小时，略浪费时间
我爱你，告诉我你爱我。
1890。真正的主题其实是父女情。连他女儿都很喜欢的前男友他也没有珍惜，自己一天持帅到处约炮。纯情同志找已婚男士淡感情是没有意义的。家庭，永远才是己婚男同心中的第1位。
各位主演的演技很好，故事很激励人也很现实，多段错位罗曼史喜剧氛围很足，没有强行煽情，于是在搞笑中得到感动。
三星，演员卖力加一星。躁郁症的中年危机，失去旧爱，女儿毕业开始事业，母亲去世等问题，时刻在亢奋，时刻心猿意马却时刻失控，剧情想表达的内容本来不错，但导演叙事能力不够，层次不分明，转折靠死亡和幡然醒悟就显得力度不够和软绵绵的了
中年同志的痛苦与挣扎…他算好的了有事业还有女儿…还在一个对LGBT相对包容的国家…除开这些…那些对爱的渴望和爱而不得的痛苦全天下其实都差不多…
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
