Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
虽然看见这些新老角色彩蛋很高兴，但依旧是看完就会忘的那种，本身就做成流媒体电影，和华纳巨星总动员差不多，甚至还不如，毕竟过于眼花缭乱，奇奇与蒂蒂的冒险全靠运气和找其他角色帮忙取胜，最后情怀煽情。
恶搞致敬了众多动画人物与电影，并且惊艳的是居然融合了众多的动画风格。
就像那个米老鼠形象的烟花
可能是这个时代的兔子罗杰，但相比于后者明显低幼了许多。里面的许多彩蛋不像头号玩家那样致敬意味，这部更像是在捏他恶搞，但不得不说那些元素正是我的快乐记忆。
迪士尼，梗王。“我一直想像这样和你们一起大笑”，我眼泪唰地流下来🤧谁不想和童年最喜欢的卡通人物在三次元并肩作战啊😭😭😭
还得是Disney啊 算是把版权玩明白了哈哈哈哈
迪士尼过气艺人大party，时代的眼泪。其实蛮有趣的，至少让人津津有味，情节也不太重要，快乐就够了，我还蛮喜欢这种2D和3D乱炖的搭配。
我不管，就冲我小时候最喜欢玩的卡带游戏人物我也要打五星！2D、3D、定格动画、玩偶、真人一锅炖，配上探案过程，有种儿时看《谁陷害了兔子罗杰》的感觉
比较神奇的电影，没法评价。感觉把彼得潘的形象给毁了
虽然小时候没看过原版的动画，但还是看的挺开心的。彩蛋密集，尤其漫展的那场戏，友商的角色也多到爆。迪士尼：对不起，有版权就是可以为所欲为。060522
人物、彩蛋和梗数不胜数，电影「刺猬索尼克」的梗应该是质量最高的，也是最有意思和最让人惊喜的。三星。
好无趣的电影，真人二维3D疯狂一锅乱炖，毫无情节可言，除了那一大堆客串，不过（猫）（索尼克）的彩蛋是挺好笑的，其他真的是无聊到快睡着。
综合评价三星半，不算特别惊艳，但是情怀拉满
有版权就是大佬大佬！！爱怎么搞怎么搞！！！这部也告诉我们，2D永远的神来的，不信你看奇奇和蒂蒂，3D简直丢在动物群里找不出来。其实我很担心，奇奇蒂蒂的小饭桌，被人踢翻呢，毕竟这么小。真人动画2D3D一起混合双打，不违和。
全世界都流行炒冷饭，主意不错，故事老套，Aïssa 推荐
#波妞的动画片剧场 之90
想起小时候玩《松鼠大战》的美好时光了，真是怀念。
2D3D真人混在一起還真是有點彆扭。彩蛋夠多，各路人物串場，但也僅此而已。意外的是寶貝竟然喜歡。
2D和3D混搭还带一些定格动画的风格看着还挺有意思，高潮部分有一点点催泪，某些时刻有灵光一闪的幽默，对ip的恶搞则已经屡见不鲜了。
世界观创意挺好 本可以更有意思
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
