Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
多少人因为害怕被荼毒，而选择深柜结婚生子，就有多少家庭悲剧。
#Sundance 2022 美丽，悲伤，震撼，人生之诗。虽然节奏慢，但是很沉醉，有种“鬼魅浮生”的伤感，旁白的絮絮低语也带有种历经沧桑后依旧迷茫的困惑。
生而为妖，缺偏要人间走一遭，先做女儿身，又当男儿郎，酸甜苦辣都尝遍，让一个妖把人做了个明明白白。好看！
6.4分左右。
男主在被男二亲了后面就去亲女主，是确定自己的性取向还是忏悔?
抛去政治意义的话，感情线有点让人一头雾水。另，对这个电影男主的道德标准要求不能太高。故事讲述的顺序碎了点，如果教授的戏份提前安排出场，观众可能会更好理解。
摄影手法和配乐旁边过于文艺片风格，有几个瞬间恍惚到莉莉周。以至于对恐怖片爱好者来说看了个空，事先声明我不属于恐怖片爱好者…但我觉得我也看了个空…
“人不能什么都怕。尤其是害怕自由。”光影，构图，真的太美了。那个吻与那场对峙。那双眼睛。
女性与女巫何尝不是一体的呢？
剧本扎实，技巧出色，故事前半段很精彩后半段中规中矩。但看完电影后又想要去了解 风信子行动。值得一看。
意识流恐怖寓言，不断地以新生视角获取感知。一股忧伤气息，一部后摇电影，一则抒情散文，导演绝对是马力克死忠粉。★★★☆/7.6
色调压抑，节奏悲凉，一些爱而不得……做人不能什么都害怕，尤其不能害怕自由！
看完做了这么多种人以后，原来还是男人的高潮容易体验 的样子。
一定要找到幕后使者
男主在被男二亲了后面就去亲女主，是确定自己的性取向还是忏悔?
说真的，看之前没想到这么好看！审讯室这一场戏真的赞，演的太好了～
You.Wont.Be.Alone.2022.MACEDONIAN.2160p.WEB-DL.x265.10bit.HDR.DDP5.1-NOGRP
平淡又稀松的叙事风格，其实就是男主在追查一起谋杀案后对自我身份认知的一个过程。原来幕后对同志赶尽杀绝的是同为同志的警察头子，最后才发现严厉的父亲其实是为了儿子的安全不要把自己卷进这个事件而丢掉性命。全片并没有对男主对自己身份认知后展开多少描述，最精彩的一场床戏结束后便将二人的关系直接收尾拉至逃亡就剧终了，制造了纪录片的感觉，但作为剧情片实在是差了一点东西，有完未完的剧情差强人意。
看着类型是恐怖片，其实是文艺片。讲的一个中世纪的小山村里，一个女巫的成长故事，恐怖就是这女巫杀了几个动物和村民吧。几处风景很漂亮，貌似就是在某山区拍摄的。
总体来说还不错，我觉得挺好看的，还是蛮不错的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
