Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
川端康成的名著改编，这个故事也有N个版本，不过就这个版本，把男女故事，用A视角和B视角的方法，有点悬疑色彩，最后结尾，让所有不自然的部分迎刃而解。
【3】感觉只在文本层面对70年代虐杀电影（重点自然是《德州电锯杀人狂》）做了解构性尝试，但整体形式和语气则距之甚远，没有那种狂野的激情，仍属当代独立恐怖产品，优点在于没有端架子，需要时有在努力制造幽默。
她眼里跳动的火光，是对幸福的渴望。爱过这件事不是徒劳。
“意识到人生虚无的人，比任何人都更渴望真实地活着”。
贫穷与苦难总是一对孪生兄弟
奈绪很好。高桥冷漠得太平面化了，岛村应该看上去是个外热内冷的人。一个“我其实也不想救风尘”的故事，这样的岛村根本无法让驹子有什么期待啊。景色很美，不知道为什么让森山演叶子，声音没有任何记忆点。摄影很美，确实是徒劳。
反恐怖片。一种新情态洗刷下的秽暗时代意象重构，通过倒(正)置性欲与屠杀在“电影”中的比重和定位完成对意大利电影侵略后老去的清教情结的怜悯和回望。铅黄色黎明之后，里根时代也到来了。
从定妆照开始就关注,终于终于上线了
昨天看完已是凌晨，为叶子之死倍感难过难过，也许，叶子的坠落是对她命运最好的安排，她好似驹子的影子，时近时远，如果不是这场大火，叶子也许会成为下一个驹子。死亡不是结束而是重生，美也不与世俗同流合污。书中经常出现的“徒劳”二字，在影片中得到了一定的诠释，相对解开了我阅读时的迷惑。不过目前我还是觉得没完全看懂书和电影，后续再进行剖析吧。感觉奈绪蛮适合驹子这一角色，益生菌演岛村还是差了点岛村的内核。非常喜欢这一版的构图还有滤镜。
觉得电影只是小说的平白直叙，没有抓到雪国的精髓
生命的虚无、洁净、哀伤，在《雪国》里达到美的极致！
奈绪的气质跟苍井优太像了 对这种气质真是毫无抵抗力 电影中规中矩 但改变了叙述顺序还挺有新意 最后的“推理”部分反而被感动了 那种奋不顾身的执着 即便如飞蛾扑火 也是自己真的想去做的事 难以隐藏的爱意 连钟表声都是你
出奇地还不错，看了原版书倒也没什么原版偏见
奈緒好美 有被驚艷到 /看到益生菌臉上的褶皺總是出戲地想 歲月是會留下痕跡的呀
三位演员都喜欢。就是故事拍得有点单薄了，结局的收尾过于不痛不痒的。
不得不说我真的真的还是好喜欢益生菌啊。奈绪太好看了，楚楚动人惹人怜爱，叙事有点点混乱，但是整体编排能接受，光影很美，特别有日本的独特文化感，我个人蛮喜欢的
就是说，编写义务教育的人可能并没有读过原著…否则不会把这种名著变成「知识点」
7/10. 精致复古，血浆黄暴，又痛又爽。乘风破浪的奶奶，c位出道，slay全场。
剧情有点像寡淡的白开水，看得昏昏欲睡。奈绪+1星，三味线是真弹，人物塑造得太好了，成为艺妓前的单纯可爱和扮成艺妓时的成熟妩媚，面对行男与叶子的前后不同态度，奔向火场时的勇敢果断
本来觉得益生菌应该是很适合这种…说难听点就是有点闲钱且没事找事的角色的…但是意外的很无聊呢…原著本来纤细敏感的气质被照搬台词以后只让人觉得有那个大病
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
