剧情介绍

  这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
  An absurdist classic
  This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.

评论:

  • 刑德惠 2小时前 :

    高桥一生健身了啊...给加一星

  • 东方瑞云 0小时前 :

    糜烂中透漏着徒劳,很好地传达了[違和感]这种微妙的涵义。造型很好,除了岛村有点像金田一耕助。

  • 旅妙之 0小时前 :

    大段大段独白+汤泽冬季风景。

  • 吉勇 8小时前 :

    白雪皑皑中的男主女主太好看了,其他已经不重要了

  • 康运 2小时前 :

    意境是美的,音乐是悲戚的,有种物哀的感觉。没看过原著,只记得徒劳两字。

  • 圣阳荣 8小时前 :

    跟原著有半毛钱关系?

  • 士贝丽 6小时前 :

    客观评价来说,影片的轻重点失衡;整体观感略微有些平淡。不过这恰好在形上已经有了七八分司马辽太郎的感觉;可惜通篇没有太多藏于细微处的壮烈感,也许是受制于水平,有些剧情,台词和镜头可以打磨的更好一些,神上与司马辽太郎的文章只有二三分相似,属实可惜。

  • 凡晨 4小时前 :

    记得看过原著的我不停感慨太高深了,太高明了!

  • 从博雅 4小时前 :

    文学性极强,甚至不惜插入大量旁白来让故事顺畅,可这种每个人在情感里都错付的苦情故事,在我看来真是无聊透顶,包括演员和没有台词的高良健吾都无亮点。

  • 大千儿 5小时前 :

    好看呐,虽然情节可预知性略高,但就是喜欢这一挂拷问观者的电影。精准的景别调度+预先张扬的炸弹时刻+类型元素拼接+连接影像与现实/恐惧与欲望的匹配剪辑(尤其是情绪高潮点的几次频闪式剪辑,击打观者内心的同时也指向了正反两位主角的二位一体,太棒了)以及某种精神污染式的“反凝视”,再到最后以“分级标志”呈现的片名完成闭环,在戏谑中直面爱和欲望的本质。BTW,查了一下,老太太果然也是Mia Goth演的,她在红光中起舞的那段一度看哭了

  • 凡呈 5小时前 :

    没有看过原著。故事在最后终于讲清楚了。摄影好美哦,好喜欢片中的摄影美学,让你仿佛置身其中,透过窗,透过屋檐,通过某人的肩膀等等去看。

  • 塞冬卉 3小时前 :

    是徒劳吗? 所以驹子爱的是行男吗?所以驹子的一生是徒劳吗?

  • 於景福 8小时前 :

    就知道不好拍 果然温开水 完成任务一样极速地交代 让人想问 你们在干什么?

  • 戢沛儿 2小时前 :

    粗读原著。细腻动人,由外及内,觉察到身影,碰触到呼吸,体会到情绪,却始终探不清人物的样子。于是当神态遮掩,脸孔模糊,恰巧是少有的动人之时。

  • 振钊 9小时前 :

    粗读原著。细腻动人,由外及内,觉察到身影,碰触到呼吸,体会到情绪,却始终探不清人物的样子。于是当神态遮掩,脸孔模糊,恰巧是少有的动人之时。

  • 关觅双 6小时前 :

    对于原著作出了一种解读。让人想再看一遍原著。

  • 信延 9小时前 :

    故事讲得不错,但隐约觉得人物缺了劲儿,情节完整又不完整,似乎少了点什么……

  • 侍晓瑶 5小时前 :

    以为在看太宰治的某段史,女主角应该换葵或者哭起来就让人怜香惜玉,奈绪一哭总以为真是干了啥坏事。导演和脚本太赶活省事了!

  • 吉涵菡 9小时前 :

    This adaptation of the historical novel by Ryotaro Shiba.navigates between, well, adapting the book, yakubd.net and (trying to) find its own footing in history.

  • 彩香 4小时前 :

    到底错过了哪里?我怎么没看懂女主和叶子的关系?

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved