剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 妍彬 8小时前 :

    五星邦德 福永是真的有东西 无论是雪地还是迷雾森林 大自然为动作场景增色许多 叙事节奏也好 引人入胜 丹尼尔克罗德的007也终于不再只是一个雄性杀人机器而更像是正义代言人 一个永恒的英雄形象 完美谢幕

  • 安辰 9小时前 :

    丹叔真不容易,从最丑最矮邦德变成了最硬汉演技最好的一任007,但这部收尾遗憾太多了,故事真的乱七八糟的,反派毫无逻辑,直接把邦德写死了,那后面要怎么拍呢?继承007的名号还有姓名?

  • 信稷 9小时前 :

    06年皇家赌场,我一直笃定,丹尼尔克雷格是最有魅力的007。只是时代变了,这种题材和叙事方式已经没有最初带给我的那种震撼。007老了,不光脸,身材虽然努力保持肌肉的容量,但细看(对洗澡那里我细看了)真的是一身老去的肌肉了。穿上紧身衣服的时候,腹部还有点点隆起。但是他还是我心目中最好的007。至于剧情,算了吧,如果倒退十年,我肯定觉得男主好伟大,身许国再难许卿。但现在,我只想这个大爷好好活下去,过一过人的日子。

  • 丘和泽 5小时前 :

    此时此刻在电影院里……丹叔,演出了有层次的Bond,farewell😭

  • 之沛白 1小时前 :

    下一任邦德会是谁?这个问题在此刻已不再重要,丹尼尔.克雷格的表现足以被我们铭记。谢谢你,丹尼尔.克雷格❤️

  • 典飞龙 8小时前 :

    阿汤哥的《碟中谍》和克雷格的《007》是现如今大银幕上仅存的两个系列特工动作大片了,今年之后,只能期待阿汤哥继续发光发热了……

  • 奕建义 3小时前 :

    原本对007的终结无感,只是彻底拜倒在古巴特工Paloma的石榴裙下,无意间想起Paloma对邦德说的最后一句话,“下回来古巴一定要多待两天。” 突然意识到,他再也没有机会去了,顿时泪目。

  • 伯博延 4小时前 :

    开头永远都是邦德说他退休了,在一个风景宜人的/人口密集/喧闹的第三世界的地方度假,然后出了娄子出来反派(一大半是组织自己搞出来的),然后一个人回头看着屏幕问:007在哪里?

  • 振鹤 6小时前 :

    Really???!!!!

  • 丁乐家 2小时前 :

    初代007的最大问题在于对路人党相当不友好。如果你不是死忠粉,或者哪怕对前几集里有那么一点对人物关系没搞清楚,就会直接影响对剧情的理解。《皇家赌场》是2006年的电影,观众如果没有理解这部15年前的电影,以及之后的三部续集,或者压根没看过,将直接影响观感——你不知道电影里谁是谁,都在讲什么。于是只能看个热闹,打打杀杀乒乒乓乓。偏偏这集又很冗长,正反派全都死于话多,于是你就只能哈欠连天。银幕中的人物无暇赴死,银幕外的你一觉睡醒嘴角还流着哈喇子。

  • 元英华 4小时前 :

    退休返聘,结果痛失一切。反派很会搞气氛,但是不会搞事业。结尾007穿着制服背着小玩偶,看着导弹如烟花般炸裂,这一系列故事也终有了一个里程碑式的结局,看得我眼眶濡湿。希望每一个喜欢过邦德的人都要看看这部电影。

  • 前莹莹 6小时前 :

    豆瓣最高的短评抨击这部电影,说邦德怎么可能会有家庭怎么可能会去赴死,说这不是邦德这部007完全反了007,其实我觉得这不应该是差评,反而是突破。就是这样才更有血有肉,才更让人动情,这反而是最不一样的007。

  • 卫珉序 6小时前 :

    几十年了,一直演一个老男人维护不列颠俘获女人心的故事。也该谢幕了。

  • 哈恨桃 4小时前 :

    正如影片最后妈妈给女儿讲故事的开头一样:从前有一个男人…

  • 善醉香 5小时前 :

    丹尼尔系列挖掘了邦德深层人性的一面。

  • 务聪睿 1小时前 :

    对于我一个对007毫无情怀的人来说 真的不太好看。丹尼尔克雷格更像是个绅士而非特工 可能身手很好 但需要很多动作戏加成 偏偏这一场飞车和枪战却少 他去拍文艺片我可能更捧场。反倒是蕾雅赛杜现在越来越有女人味了太好看了!

  • 卫博义 2小时前 :

    一如既往的007风格,这次邦德有了老婆和女儿,成丈夫了,她们是他的的一切。给丹尼尔007画下了句号

  • 巫嘉懿 8小时前 :

    纯属于谢幕作品感情加成,编剧和场面确实没啥好说的。

  • 嘉运 2小时前 :

    我是从做电影杂志编辑工作之后才开始看的007系列,之前一直看不上这种商业大片franchise。一看就喜欢上了,甚至对评价很低的提摩西·道尔顿都喜欢。最高的当然是肖恩康纳利和乔治拉赞比,反倒不是特别喜欢罗杰摩尔和布鲁斯南的007。对丹尼尔的《皇家赌场》非常喜欢,但《天幕杀机》之后味道越来越不对。这部前半段不错,后面直接跌泥坑里了:缺乏悬念,反派太弱,007过于感情用事,打斗不精彩,高科技不突出……可惜了一众好演员,有点为了完结而完结!

  • 司马飞柏 3小时前 :

    摄影美绝。节奏上看起来问题其实并不甚大,也并不会让人觉得有多么冗长。只是剧作上漏洞还是颇多,明显是为了既定的结局而奔去。有了束缚导致错漏也愈加明显。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved