Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
比较温情，男人的友谊？我以为是爽片，但不是。
6分，崔珉植大叔的演技没得挑，可惜剧情单薄了一点
完成度很高 崔大爷单挑的好戏 数学题材竟然也能拍的这么舒适自然 数学公式的演绎如此美丽 再加上南北关系背景 应该算是冷门佳片了
描写的很真实，人都是为自己考虑的，在泥潭一样的世界里，你会做怎样的选择？
不理解评分为什么这么低。很舒适很安逸。我什么时候能够找到这样坚定简单的信仰然后为之活下去呢。
描写的很真实，人都是为自己考虑的，在泥潭一样的世界里，你会做怎样的选择？
是挨饿还是做恶？暗无天日的社会不曾给这个底层少年别的机会，工头、警察、直至参加竞选走仕途的大老板，无一缺席，编织了一张吸血的大网，无处躲藏，所以第七个囚徒离开那扇铁门时，只是换了一个被关的笼子…
任何世界未解之谜都可以从北朝鲜人身上找到答案，韩国电影扯淡到极致，崔佬还是认真答题了。
最近被深深依赖的公司辞退了，究其原因还是自己太软弱。
要解决问题，先理解问题。电影结尾走向了爽文高潮~
是我看的翻译有问题吗？后半段这啥啊？怎么就老师被学生牺牲自己感动了，他不是被威胁了么？怎么数学老师突然就不打自招了？那个女学生不敢站出来说话安顿别人申冤？怎么的你家势力这么大有正义感不敢执行？逃到了国外成果就能不被泄露出去吗？要讲师生情就好好讲，强行圆场不伦不类的。崔大叔咱要不还是砍人或者干老虎吧，搞笑片也行啊，别接这文艺兮兮本子了，演的好也太出戏了
ᐈ我这辈子没见过这么多汽车
前三分之二都不错，结尾韩国强行拔高，失了片子的基调。
其实该是三星半 很喜欢老师对于学数学的态度那段话 掺杂了政治因素进来稍微有点无奈 对于剧情的推动有作用又好像没作用Otz
复杂又轻松的剧情，看着还挺温暖，美好的生活美好的未来美好的向往。
很不错的一部片子，字幕再完美一些就好了，主演很棒，师徒之情有时候的确能超越世间大部分感情
无尽的深渊，我们生来是幸运的，幸运的生活在中国这个全世界最安定的国家，幸运的出生在没有那么底层的家庭，希望社会能够越来越安定，希望无论在做什么决定的时候一定要多一些心眼，任何事情有担心才是正常的，希望这样的深渊越来越少
但愿我也能成为这样优秀的老师
非常担忧崔老师会不会上着上着课，这小榔头、小斧子什么的就掏出来了 .........
脱北数学家的政治正确，高校后进生的正义凛然。借用数学的外壳上演民族的争斗、教育的腐败和人世的温情，韩国人永远不会放弃三八线两端的题材，也永远不会停止针砭时弊，当然他们更擅长于无声处听惊雷，就这样一部中规中矩、一板一眼的电影，没人会觉得它乏味反而余韵悠长。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
