剧情介绍

You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!

评论:

  • 路清韵 6小时前 :

    确实太无聊了,坚持看了将近50分钟,实在是看不下去了,之前看过电视剧,就看了一下这个电影,没想到这么无聊。

  • 美萱 8小时前 :

    很显然,现在出品方也没有闲钱支持导演瞎玩了,网大作品。。。

  • 本静秀 0小时前 :

    emmm,合格的爆米fa片,场面宏大,特效震撼!有一说一,月球被拉到洛希极限之内还能退回去的嘛🤔

  • 枫灵 2小时前 :

    其实是合格的好莱坞灾难片 虽然题材不新(进入月球内部算吗) 特效也还过得去 地球跟太空两条线都能呼应上 人物也都有交代 电影院看应该会能再加半星 现在分有点低

  • 梁丘飞兰 1小时前 :

    当配角可以演主角了以后,就自然而然有了女主角,感觉是标配,总体是轻松又活泼的,生硬的将现在商业模式套用,可以看的一部轻松番外电影,别期待太高,但也不至于失望透顶。

  • 有琴芷巧 1小时前 :

    编剧脑子瓦特了,乱几把写,怎么不令人信服怎么写。

  • 骞嘉 9小时前 :

    全靠特效制造奇观支持影片,现今早已经不可持续,因为特效烂大街了!要有情节,创新,创意啊?!

  • 贰清雅 4小时前 :

    男主的驱魔业务已经扩展到了太空吗?这次不用圣水,改电磁脉冲了。

  • 祝曼青 8小时前 :

    罗兰艾默里奇,这个名字就是灾难片的保证,当年的《2012》《后天》,那是多么的经典啊,可是如今他瞅上了月球,带来的故事却有些拉跨了,特效没的说,真的很赞,尤其是最后月球内部的想象,可是科幻片和灾难片如今已经不再是纯粹的特效的天下了,故事讲不好,再好的特效也有乏的时候,点子好,特效好,没故事,真的没钱途了。这都2022年了,还是当年的套路没变化真的是认真的吗?就算月球真的掉下来也于事无补了。不过怎么说呢,这两年疫情关系,电影院也看的少了,看看特效也是好的,因为没得看了。

  • 曲绿夏 3小时前 :

    在互联网巨头眼里,专利权算个p,抄袭更是家常便饭。

  • 肥凌春 8小时前 :

    老一套类型模式自己照搬自己,老调重弹的新瓶子装旧酒式灾难鬼片。

  • 百里一凡 4小时前 :

    1亿多刀的成本,真的不是国内外公司联手在洗钱吗?

  • 禽寻春 5小时前 :

    这是把脑洞告诉小学生,然后让小学生写的剧本吧?把地球线砍掉,拉长月球线,加个和人类祖先的第三类接触,估计勉强能及格。

  • 礼和颂 7小时前 :

    男主儿子(看他总觉得在看张全蛋?)、交换生的戏份可以去掉。

  • 萱洲 0小时前 :

    艾默里奇真的太喜欢毁灭地球了,然而在2022年封城期间看这部片子的感触也很不同:“毁灭吧!一起毁灭吧!”

  • 藤孤菱 3小时前 :

    美式瞎扯(全靠“民科”发现真想;美军干啥不行找人第一名;舍生取义的继父哥;破镜重圆父子),到处拼凑创意(2012、普罗米修斯啥的)的网络文学,和披着科幻外衣的基督教价值故事(神创论、大毁灭balabala)。除了莫名其妙的中文,居然还不算难看,特技加得duangduang的

  • 理暖姝 9小时前 :

    怎么能拍的如此无趣??所谓的宏大叙事其实就是一堆无聊情节的堆积,所谓的科幻却用神棍支撑,结尾的处理更是莫名其妙而且极为潦草,还有赤裸裸的选角政治正确,黑人科学家法官军官宇航员占据了重要职位的半壁江山,三颗星给被摧毁的纽约特效

  • 隽南琴 9小时前 :

    幸好Carl Sagan看不到这片子,不然会被气死。

  • 锦寒 7小时前 :

    月球空心和戴森球是在抖音上听到的理论,对月球陨落的恐惧居然来自对人工智能的恐惧。是导演拍过的电影里比较弱的一部。有点乱。但是博士要靠搞卫生做餐厅服务员度日导演你要这么狠毒吗

  • 浩琛 0小时前 :

    特效还在,套路却还是老套路,不如《后天》也不如《2012》,与其说是灾难片倒不如说是科幻片。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved