A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
难看，胡编乱造的蠢电影，毫无新意的特效和动作场景，被无意义的斗嘴喧宾夺主，关键是，还不好笑。实在看不出这一部续集有什么存在的必要，刷新漫威超英电影下限。
Natural born killers 竟然混到了被咬掉头的地步。全片出了主要人物之外，几乎没别的演员，真是疫情时期作品。
看之前：这是什么鬼？ 看之后：这tm什么鬼！
拍的是啥 感情线没了 且为什么杀人狂要和他做朋友？ 为了让carnage出来？
爆米花娱乐片最大的原罪是无聊，是怎么做到从动作、故事情节甚至腐向CP等各方面都找不出一丝乐趣的？我个人已经把对超英片的要求标准降得很低了，毒液2依旧能做到让我看两分钟就想玩手机。毒液和埃迪的互动缺乏火花，台词不够幽默，反派不够酷炫，都不如嚎叫妹子出彩，结尾教堂大战，Anne从钟楼上掉下去的那一幕为什么超凡2那场噩梦的即视感那么强？是有毛病吗cos那场戏要干嘛？？看完只想说行行好放过前任吧。对彩蛋没兴趣，单人电影就好好拍单人不行吗？
特效是没话说，黏黏糊糊并兼顾刚猛有力，当个爽片看看差不多了。
I wish you could see this eddie 本来就是想看看汤 x woody对手戏顺便磕磕傻子cp 而且汤不是也参与编剧了吗？结果就这？我看片的表情和little simz一样蒙逼
什么情景喜剧？这么烂的片国内怎么还不引进啊，影院都急死了！3/10
马丁当年说的电影游乐园化的趋势在今年已然非常明显，这已经是电影的至暗时刻了。
带着5.0的预期看竟然被惊喜到，至少比上一部好看，剧情薄弱，但是特效打斗还不错
屠杀屠杀了个寂寞，半集才出来，结果被宿主对象吵了个半死。再次表达主题神一样的对手不及猪一样的队友。毒液那么多年的生存阅历，结果还跟个弱智一样。变态想要跟eddie的友谊？一个半小时的电影看的我满头问号。
脑子里只有看过的无数漫威同人小h漫。//电影是真差劲。
可能因为有些对白不看字幕确实听不明白导致get不到一些笑点，整体观影体验不如第一部.等国内出资源了再看一遍.但是埃迪真的很爱安，戳死我了😭以及彩蛋确实很会👍
特别想给电影院提个建议：电影院里严禁养鹅。我就看个电影，怎么前后左右全是奇奇怪怪的鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅的声音呢？说回电影本身，确实是太好笑了鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅鹅
功夫里的狮吼功加大喇叭功力可翻倍，毒液2里的狮吼功却被大喇叭压死了。毒液的嘴也太碎了，可能是小鸡脑壳吃多了
确实是绝美爱情故事的续集。毒液和埃迪之间，还有反派那对男女，设定来说都很不错。教堂的打斗设计很有意境，也确实是做到了拆迁办的效果，另外毒液抓住安的那幕真的太像超凡蜘蛛侠里的格温那幕了，唉。此外我很好奇，为啥这部不能引进呢？领导们看出来了毒液和埃迪是一对？||哦，原来是汤老师那件事、
这剪辑也太差了吧……跟初剪一样急匆匆的。另外，谢谢，我讨厌黑命贵做作的表演方式。5.5/10 21/11/06
还玩英雄救美那套
继承了第1步的嘴炮，但是没有继承其他优点。故事也是炒冷饭和第1部都差不多，反派屠杀智商堪忧。片长也略短，感觉只是讲第1部没有讲完的故事。或者说应该是第1步的后半段剪辑出来的。直到看到片尾彩蛋哇才知道了这部影片的意义，小蜘蛛终于要现身了，是要和MCU对接了吗？
屠杀真心被削弱了，漫画里可是战力天花板，狠到小虫找毒液帮忙，狠到团灭复联，电影太短了，屠杀的发展空间大大下降，剧情经不起推敲，不过安迪瑟金斯的执导下，动捕效果很不错，尾声的彩蛋无疑是剧透了小虫3的平行宇宙概念，索尼的蜘蛛宇宙雏形已经出来了，虽然剧情一锅糊，看看特效也是一种欣赏，这次的毒液共生体真忙。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
